Skip to content
Prioritise what to build

The loudest request is not the biggest problem.

Three things compete for the same sprint. adduce puts the evidence behind each one side by side, cites every source, and grades how sure it is, so your team argues about the decision instead of the data.

Connect your first source See the team's decision

Rank on evidence. Explain the order in one page.

The backlog is yours to order. adduce shows what stands behind each item, so the order is a decision, not a shouting match.

  • See the weight behind each item.

    Strong, supported or limited: how much evidence sits behind a brief, next to its place in the list.

  • Compare three things on the same terms.

    Customer impact, beneficiaries, objective contribution and delivery estimate, side by side. One table, no slides.

  • Answer “why this first?” in one line.

    Every claim in the comparison cites its record. The person who asks can open it.

Act

What your team gets.

A priority decision: the briefs in the order your team chose, the reasons, and a date to revisit it.

Who runs this.

Product managers and ownersDevelopers and engineering leadsFounders

Questions.

Does adduce rank my backlog?
No. It puts the evidence behind each problem side by side. Your team weighs strategic fit, urgency, effort and capacity, and records the decision.
Does one source count?
Yes. A single-source finding is kept and graded. Severity is judged separately.
What if two problems conflict?
The comparison shows what each case rests on. The conflict is settled by your team in a priority decision, with the rationale written down, not by a score.

Make your next priority easier to explain.

Start with the evidence behind a problem your team is considering. The comparison cites what it used and says how sure it is.

Connect your first source Next: turn feedback into delivery briefs